From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6043 invoked by alias); 8 May 2002 22:16:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6018 invoked by uid 71); 8 May 2002 22:16:05 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 15:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020508221604.6013.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: optimization/6588: throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ? Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/6588; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: Sylvain Pion Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/6588: throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ? Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 15:10:47 -0700 On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 11:58:18PM +0200, Sylvain Pion wrote: > I made some benchmarks with the SunPro compiler, and it's 20 times faster. > (maybe it's not as correct as GCC, though) One of the changes for gcc 3.0 (that probably made it slower) is that we support throwing exceptions between languages. r~