From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1581 invoked by alias); 9 May 2002 17:56:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1527 invoked by uid 71); 9 May 2002 17:56:08 -0000 Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020509175608.1521.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: ro@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Richard B. Kreckel" Subject: Re: target/5505: Doubts about a patch for OSF Reply-To: "Richard B. Kreckel" X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00264.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/5505; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Richard B. Kreckel" To: Rainer Orth Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/5505: Doubts about a patch for OSF Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 19:51:07 +0200 (CEST) On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Rainer Orth wrote: > > > If you have some time, it would be nice if you could confirm the > > > dependence on -fno-exceptions before I start stripping that down. Thanks! > > > > Indeed: the test program works (i.e. doesn't crash) at -O2 and -O1 > > -fno-exceptions, but SEGVs at -O2 -fno-exceptions. > > This seems to be fixed in g++ 3.1 20020327: I've sucessfully built the test > with -O2 -fno-exceptions. As an additional test, I've configured CLN 1.1.4 > with CXXFLAGS='-O2 -fno-exceptions' --disable-shared --without-gmp and all > tests passed. If you can confirm that this really works for you, the PR > can be closed. I just tired the prerelease g++ 3.1 20020422 and it seems to work indeed. So, yes, the PR may be closed. BTW, do you have any idea what kind of interference with -fno-exceptions was triggered by your patch? Regards -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel