From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-18508-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13999 invoked by alias); 10 May 2002 12:36:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13982 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2002 12:36:02 -0000
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 05:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020510123602.13981.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: ro@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Subject: Re: target/5505: Doubts about a patch for OSF
Reply-To: Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/5505; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Richard.Kreckel@Uni-Mainz.DE
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/5505: Doubts about a patch for OSF
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 14:26:17 +0200 (MEST)

 Richard B. Kreckel writes:
 
 > I just tired the prerelease g++ 3.1 20020422 and it seems to work indeed.  
 > So, yes, the PR may be closed.  BTW, do you have any idea what kind of
 
 fine, thanks for the confirmation.
 
 > interference with -fno-exceptions was triggered by your patch?
 
 Not really: some generic improvements on weak symbol handling went in on
 after 3.0.x, but I cannot pinpoint the exact problem.
 
 	Rainer