From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 740 invoked by alias); 11 May 2002 21:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 708 invoked by uid 71); 11 May 2002 21:46:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 14:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020511214601.704.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Tom Tromey Subject: java/6520 Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/6520; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Tromey To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Mark Wielaard Subject: java/6520 Date: 11 May 2002 15:48:28 -0600 I found a small example showing the problem in PR java/6520. The problem is that the second Float.NaN is not promoted to double. public class foo { public static void check (double x, double y) { System.out.println (x == y); } public static void main(String[] args) { check (Math.min (2.0f, Float.NaN), Float.NaN); } } Tom