From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10338 invoked by alias); 12 May 2002 00:44:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10308 invoked by uid 61); 12 May 2002 00:44:36 -0000 Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 17:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020512004436.10307.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@klomp.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: tromey@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: tromey@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@klomp.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/6391: Constant float to int conversions don't use ieee_real_to_integer when compiled to byte-code X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00329.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Constant float to int conversions don't use ieee_real_to_integer when compiled to byte-code State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: tromey State-Changed-When: Sat May 11 17:44:36 2002 State-Changed-Why: I looked at this a bit today. The problem is that fold_convert() isn't using java semantics. We need some way to tell it about this difference between C and Java. I'm not exactly sure what how that should happen; I'll ask. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6391