From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9940 invoked by alias); 15 May 2002 14:37:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9887 invoked by uid 61); 15 May 2002 14:36:58 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 07:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020515143658.9886.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, plasmahh@tzi.de From: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, plasmahh@tzi.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/6518: ??? X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00422.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: ??? Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->bkoz Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 15 07:36:57 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: Mine. State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bkoz State-Changed-When: Wed May 15 07:36:57 2002 State-Changed-Why: Yikes. I've reproduced this on mainline and the gcc-3.1 branch. What do do with s when NULL is not specified: I've asked the library reflector about this. In the meantime, I've the following patch, which sets failbit and doesn't crash. Let me know what you think. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg01205.html Thanks, benjamin http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6518