From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-18694-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21017 invoked by alias); 17 May 2002 04:56:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21003 invoked by uid 71); 17 May 2002 04:56:00 -0000
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 21:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020517045600.21002.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Nam SungHyun <namsh@wimo.co.kr>
Subject: Re: optimization/6673: gcc-3.1 produces wrong assembly code
Reply-To: Nam SungHyun <namsh@wimo.co.kr>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00477.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/6673; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nam SungHyun <namsh@wimo.co.kr>
To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, namsh@kldp.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/6673: gcc-3.1 produces wrong assembly code
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 13:53:24 +0900

 rth@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: gcc-3.1 produces wrong assembly code
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
 > State-Changed-By: rth
 > State-Changed-When: Thu May 16 19:12:57 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     As diagnosed, not a bug.
 
 I saw the feed back message from the gnats web, but did not get a
 mail. Did not know how I can reply for that feedback.
 
 I just wanted to be sure:
 
     the 'a' in my example source is a 'global variable'.
     So, should the gcc treat it as a volatile by default?
     There are so many multi-threaded program. I didn't see
     any program which use volatile for the global variable.
 
 Regards,
 
 namsh