From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29783 invoked by alias); 17 May 2002 23:40:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29764 invoked by uid 61); 17 May 2002 23:40:17 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 16:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020517234017.29763.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@ecriticalinc.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@ecriticalinc.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/6708: c++ -O2 causes exe to seg fault on valid code X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00532.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: c++ -O2 causes exe to seg fault on valid code State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: paolo State-Changed-When: Fri May 17 16:40:16 2002 State-Changed-Why: In fact the code is invalid, since foo1, a non-void function, is missing a return statement. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6708