From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-18784-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2693 invoked by alias); 19 May 2002 12:10:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2664 invoked by uid 61); 19 May 2002 12:10:33 -0000
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 05:10:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020519121033.2663.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, neil@gcc.gnu.org,
  yann.droneaud@iupmime.univ-lemans.fr
From: neil@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: neil@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  neil@gcc.gnu.org, yann.droneaud@iupmime.univ-lemans.fr,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: preprocessor/2928: out of memory during macros expansion
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00567.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: out of memory during macros expansion

State-Changed-From-To: closed->feedback
State-Changed-By: neil
State-Changed-When: Sun May 19 05:10:32 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    FYI, 3.0.4 will take up less memory (probably about 20%
    of 3.0), and 3.1 a lot less again at around 2% of 3.0.  That's my guess if your original case swallowed 500MB like I seem to recall 8-)
    
    You might want to compare.
    
    Neil.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2928