From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9380 invoked by alias); 27 May 2002 09:46:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9350 invoked by uid 71); 27 May 2002 09:46:07 -0000 Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 03:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020527094606.9346.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Gabriel Dos Reis Subject: Re: libstdc++/6784: SEGV using istream >> operator under gcc-3.1/sun-sparc-solaris2.6 Reply-To: Gabriel Dos Reis X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00858.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6784; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: bkoz@redhat.com Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/6784: SEGV using istream >> operator under gcc-3.1/sun-sparc-solaris2.6 Date: 27 May 2002 11:43:27 +0200 Benjamin Kosnik writes: | > OK, thanks. Knowing that, we could try not to use it for formatted | > input. But I won't insist since I'm not likely to contribute the code | > immediately. | | It's a corner case and not worth the effort, I think. It's not like | formatted input is broken: just the max() value. Documenting the issue | is enough, I think. OK. Let's go with your suggestion. -- Gaby