public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grigory_Zagorodnev@vniief.ims.intel.com
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: c++/6828: g++3 makes wrong mangled name for template cast operator
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 03:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020527100913.19338.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)


>Number:         6828
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       g++3 makes wrong mangled name for template cast operator
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon May 27 03:16:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Grigory Zagorodnev
>Release:        3.1
>Organization:
>Environment:
host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configured with: ./configure
>Description:
1. The issue

In the given testcase, for operator "template <class T> C::operator T ()" with 
T = {int}, g++3 compiler produces the following mangled name:
    _ZN1CcviIiEEv

but it's expected to have mangled name "_ZN1CcvT_IiEEv" here.

--- testcase (fail.cpp) -------------------------------------
struct C {
  template <class T>
  operator T ();
};

template <class T>
C::operator T () { return 0; }

template C::operator int ();
--------------------------------------------------------------

2. Clarify the issue
Unfortunately, the mangling grammer given in the ABI is ambiguous in this area, so we need to think more about it.

First of all, let's decompose the mangled name taking GCC's encoding (it does not matter which one to take).
We are interesting in the following parts of '_ZN1CcviIiEEv' mangled name:
	a) cvi		# <operator-name> ::= cv <type>
	b) IiE		# <template-args> ::= I <type>+ E

In both parts, value of <type> used to be the same. And it is really the same 8-).
But, only one question is there: 
	Which part should be encoded/decoded first? (the hen or the egg)

As I can see, part a) depends on type value of b). 
So the <type> in the a should be a reference to template argument from b.


3. Clarify compiler behaviour
Let's change our example to make the behaviour more clean and see what exactly compilers are doing. 
According to the ABI, built-in types are not substituted, so it's better to change built-in type 'int' to some class 'A'.

Now we that g++3 encodes operator as:
	_ZN1Ccv1AIS0_EEv
i.e. type 1A in the part (a) of mangled name becomes major one, and part (b) reference it by <substitution>

While the correct code is:
	_ZN1CcvT_I1AEEv
where part (a) depends from type specified in part (b) so it reference it as <template-param>.


4. Decoder
It's true that the 'c++filt' is not able to decode given names. But decoder is not guilty.
The root of the problem is the mangling grammer.

>How-To-Repeat:
1. compile testcase 
    g++3 -c fail.cpp

2. get list of produced mangled names in the object file
    nm fail.o | grep _Z

3. You will see
**** T _ZN1CcviIiEEv
Which is wrong.
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


             reply	other threads:[~2002-05-27 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-27  3:26 Grigory_Zagorodnev [this message]
2002-06-24  8:03 lerdsuwa
2002-07-29  7:06 Kriang Lerdsuwanakij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020527100913.19338.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=grigory_zagorodnev@vniief.ims.intel.com \
    --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).