From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14959 invoked by alias); 29 May 2002 09:26:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14912 invoked by uid 61); 29 May 2002 09:26:11 -0000 Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 02:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020529092611.14911.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE From: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/6553: 26_numerics/complex_inserters_extractors.cc fails in Tru64 UNIX V5.1 X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00943.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: 26_numerics/complex_inserters_extractors.cc fails in Tru64 UNIX V5.1 Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->bkoz Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 29 02:26:09 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: Mine. State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bkoz State-Changed-When: Wed May 29 02:26:09 2002 State-Changed-Why: Hi! Hey, I think the fix to this is pretty simple: libstdc++-v3/config/os/osf/osf5.0/bits/cpu_limits.h has: #define __glibcpp_long_bits 64 #define __glibcpp_long_double_bits 128 So, to get this working, don't you just have to add an OSF 4.0 config that doesn't have these defines? Seems pretty simple, if this is it. best, benjamin http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6553