From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30523 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2002 19:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30509 invoked by uid 71); 2 Jun 2002 19:36:02 -0000 Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 12:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020602193602.30508.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: optimization/6822: GCC 3.1.1 - Internal compiler error in extract_insn, at recog.c:2132 Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/6822; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: Glen Nakamura Cc: Eric Botcazou , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/6822: GCC 3.1.1 - Internal compiler error in extract_insn, at recog.c:2132 Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 12:27:26 -0700 On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 05:33:01PM -1000, Glen Nakamura wrote: > * fold-const.c (fold): Modify the transformation of a comparison > against the highest or lowest integer value to adjust for the > previous transformation which converts 'X >= CST to X > (CST - 1)' > and 'X < CST to X <= (CST - 1)'. Would you update this for mainline? I believe we fixed the regression for the branch another way, but if there are valid simplifications we're missing... r~