From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-19336-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7745 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2002 20:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7729 invoked by uid 71); 3 Jun 2002 20:26:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 13:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020603202601.7728.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Kevin Nomura <nomura@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/6793: varargs constructor inlined inappropriately.
Reply-To: Kevin Nomura <nomura@netapp.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/6793; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Kevin Nomura <nomura@netapp.com>
To: andrea.latina@to.infn.it, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/6793: varargs constructor inlined inappropriately.
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 13:19:06 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6793
 
 I hit the same problem with a simpler, plain C testcase.
 Compile the following at -O2.  Fails with gcc 3.1, passes
 with 3.0.4 and earlier.
 
 
 static void inline chdebug(const char *fmt, ... )
 {
 	__builtin_next_arg(fmt);
 }
 
 
 extern void foo(void);
 void foo(void)
 {
 	chdebug("ch_monitor: verifying connection ");
 }