From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-19374-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17311 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2002 15:56:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17218 invoked by uid 71); 5 Jun 2002 15:56:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 08:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020605155601.17214.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@wasabisystems.com>
Subject: Re: target/6912: x86_64 switch code generation problem with -fPIC
Reply-To: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@wasabisystems.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/6912; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@wasabisystems.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/6912: x86_64 switch code generation problem with -fPIC
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:44:50 +0200

 I did a checkout of gcc 3.1 (gcc_3_1_release tag), and found that
 plain 3.1 generates the correct code. However, the head of the
 3.1 branch (gcc-3_1-branch tag) generates incorrect code for
 this case.
 
 That narrows it down to changes put on the 3.1 branch after
 3.1 was released.
 
 - Frank