From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-19477-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11458 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2002 14:16:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11441 invoked by uid 71); 10 Jun 2002 14:16:06 -0000
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 07:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020610141606.11440.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/6189: Regression from 3.0.x: g++ -O3 generates
 wrong code
Reply-To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/6189; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/6189: Regression from 3.0.x: g++ -O3 generates
 wrong code
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:06:07 +0100

 >>>>> "Reichelt" == Reichelt  <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
 
 > Is there any reason why you did not close the PR? The problem seems to
 > be fixed in gcc 3.1 as well as in mainline (gcc 3.2 20020610).
 
 Because I thought we might want to fix it in a hypothetical 3.0.5 release.
 
 Jason