From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22994 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2002 23:26:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22971 invoked by uid 71); 11 Jun 2002 23:26:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020611232602.22969.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Phil Edwards Subject: Re: libstdc++/6998: failure when #include Reply-To: Phil Edwards X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00264.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6998; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Phil Edwards To: Jerry Pendergraft Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/6998: failure when #include Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:20:41 -0400 On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:07:59PM -0500, Jerry Pendergraft wrote: > Oh - by the way could you tell me a little about which libstdc++-v3 to use. > The install page for libstdc++-v3 tells me to trash the one that comes > with gcc-3.1 and use their latest snapshot. But that .x.97 appears to be > older than the one in the 3.1 distribution? Yes, you should use the one that comes with 3.1. The 3.0.97 snapshot should only replace a 3.0 GCC. -- If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams