From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-19534-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10573 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2002 14:46:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10480 invoked by uid 71); 12 Jun 2002 14:46:06 -0000
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 07:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020612144606.10479.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: c/6964: Internal compiler error using -O2 but ok using -O0
Reply-To: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00275.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/6964; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, jari@thep.lu.se, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
        gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/6964: Internal compiler error using -O2 but ok using -O0
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 17:14:48 +0200

 Hi,
 
 the testcase can be reduced to the following code snippet
 (which even fails with "gcc -O -c"):
 
 ------------------------------snip here--------------------------
 float foo (void)
 {
     float x[2];
     return x[1];
 }
 ------------------------------snip here--------------------------
 
 The bug is a regression from 3.0.x and is present in 3.1 and the main
 trunk (gcc 3.2 20020609) - checked on a i686-pc-linux-gnu.
 
 Greetings,
 Volker Reichelt
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6964