From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-19566-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1680 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2002 16:16:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1623 invoked by uid 71); 13 Jun 2002 16:16:02 -0000
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020613161602.1621.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: c/7010: Bug in 3.1 with inline memcpy
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00307.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/7010; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
Cc: Martin Kahlert <martin.kahlert@infineon.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
   rth@cygnus.com, aj@suse.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/7010: Bug in 3.1 with inline memcpy
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:13:12 -0400

 On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 06:05:55PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
 > > #include <string.h>
 > > 
 > > int main()
 > > {
 > >  char dst[16];
 > >  char src[16];
 > >  int tocopy = 5;
 > > 
 > >  memcpy (dst+5, src, tocopy);
 > > 
 > >  return 0;
 > > }
 > 
 > Oh no, another pasto in my code :(
 > I am just proffreading both functions to catch similar bugs, if they
 > exists.
 > 
 > Bootstrapped/regtested branch, OK for mainline/branch?
 > Ok to add testcase into mainline testsuite?
 
 I think the testcase would be useful on branch too, just
 it shouldn't use string.h but whatever simplified code reproduces this
 (as with string.h it depends on what exact libc you're using etc.).
 
 	Jakub