From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-19634-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8695 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2002 04:46:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8661 invoked by uid 71); 17 Jun 2002 04:46:03 -0000
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 23:07:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020617044603.8658.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: law@redhat.com
Subject: Re: c/7047: -march=2.0 often fails 
Reply-To: law@redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/7047; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: law@redhat.com
To: "L. D. Marks" <ldm@risc4.numis.nwu.edu>
Cc: L-marks@nwu.edu, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/7047: -march=2.0 often fails 
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 22:46:02 -0600

 In message <Pine.HPX.4.20.0206161541100.19253-100000@risc4.numis.nwu.edu>, "L. 
 D. Marks" writes:
  > Thanks. Is 3.1.1 available (and stable)?
 No.  Unknown, though I doubt it would de-stabilize much (if at all) given
 that the only changes allowed for GCC 3.1.x are fixes for regressions
 against earlier releases of GCC.
 
 jeff