From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5169 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2002 23:12:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5138 invoked by uid 61); 20 Jun 2002 23:12:38 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020620231238.5137.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: edward.connell@sas.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, uweigand@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, edward.connell@sas.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, uweigand@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/4959: gcc/s390 fails with more than 1024 function pointers X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: gcc/s390 fails with more than 1024 function pointers Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->uweigand Responsible-Changed-By: rth Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jun 20 16:12:37 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: Didn't you fix something like this for 3.1? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4959