From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-19872-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18361 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2002 22:46:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18334 invoked by uid 71); 25 Jun 2002 22:46:04 -0000
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020625224604.18333.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: c/7127: -Wswitch ineffective on GCC 3.0/Debian (Regression from 2.95)
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00613.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/7127; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: claus.fischer@clausfischer.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/7127: -Wswitch ineffective on GCC 3.0/Debian (Regression from 2.95)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:38:44 -0400

 This has been fixed in gcc 3.2 at least, I think this was fixed 
 in 3.1 also.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski