From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15370 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2002 21:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15345 invoked by uid 71); 27 Jun 2002 21:56:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020627215601.15341.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: pme@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Phil Edwards Subject: Re: libstdc++/6712: __default_alloc_template erroneously calls realloc Reply-To: Phil Edwards X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00666.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6712; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Phil Edwards To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: brd@paradise.net.nz, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/6712: __default_alloc_template erroneously calls realloc Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 17:53:33 -0400 On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 01:46:02AM -0000, Phil Edwards wrote: > The easiest "fix" would be to just rip out all the reallocation routines > that SGI had in their code. Unused, nonstandard, and (as you've just > pointed out) potentially fatal. For the record, this is what I'm in the middle of doing. The reallocate() member functions will be present in 3.2, but deprecated, and will be removed entirely in 3.3. Phil -- If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams