From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-19970-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6427 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2002 00:56:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6374 invoked by uid 71); 29 Jun 2002 00:56:02 -0000
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:15:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020629005602.6373.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should *always* be unrolled
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00711.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/7120; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, davem@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
   gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should *always* be unrolled
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:48:24 -0700

 On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:11:26AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
 > Were you suggesting to remove the n_iterations == 2 case?
 
 No, just didn't feel like typing it.
 
 
 Patch is ok.
 
 
 r~