From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-20024-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1999 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2002 21:56:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1938 invoked by uid 71); 1 Jul 2002 21:56:06 -0000
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 14:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020701215606.1937.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: c++/7181: foo<n>::bar = foo<n-1>::bar + foo<n-2>::bar evaluates to 
 zero at compile time
Reply-To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/7181; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, dobrynin@bigfoot.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/7181: foo<n>::bar = foo<n-1>::bar + foo<n-2>::bar evaluates to 
 zero at compile time
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 22:50:53 +0100

 paolo@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 > 
 > Synopsis: foo<n>::bar = foo<n-1>::bar + foo<n-2>::bar evaluates to zero at
 FYI, this is broken in 2.96RH too, so is quite old. The static initializers
 are emitted in the wrong order so we initialize foo<n> before foo<n-1>. doh!
 
 nathan
 
 -- 
 Dr Nathan Sidwell   ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::   CodeSourcery LLC
          'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
 nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org