From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-20063-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2300 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2002 18:16:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2278 invoked by uid 71); 2 Jul 2002 18:16:07 -0000
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 11:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020702181607.2271.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: c/6964: Internal compiler error using -O2 but ok using -O0
Reply-To: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/6964; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, jari@thep.lu.se, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
        nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/6964: Internal compiler error using -O2 but ok using -O0
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 20:47:12 +0200

 Hi,
 
 the bug seems to be fixed since both testcases (the original one and the
 reduced one) now compile fine with gcc 3.1.1 20020701 and gcc 3.2
 20020702 (checked on i686-pc-linux-gnu).
 
 Hence, the PR can probably be closed.
 
 Greetings,
 Volker Reichelt
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6964