From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-20115-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12250 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2002 17:26:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12226 invoked by uid 71); 3 Jul 2002 17:26:03 -0000
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020703172603.12225.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz@nabi.net>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/7186: DR179 for std::deque::iterator and const_iterator
Reply-To: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz@nabi.net>
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/7186; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz@nabi.net>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
Cc: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org, pcarlini@unitus.it,
   gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/7186: DR179 for std::deque::iterator and const_iterator
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:11:17 -0700

 > >    Is there a survey of existing practice for this issue?
 > >
 > Agreed, I'm going to take care of this, surveying the existing
 > practice of 3 or 4 implementations I have access too.
 
 Great.
 
 > > Can all but the reverse_iterator bits go in now, since that will
 > > have ABI-impacting effects?
 > >
 > Well, as I mentioned in the PR, decoupling the reverse_iterator case 
 > from the "normal" iterator case seems difficult for the special 
 > std::deque::iterator and const_iterator case (it isn't for 
 > __normal_iterator, used by the other standard containers). Again, I
 > will do my best in the next weeks.
 
 Hmm. 
 
 Thanks for looking into this.
 
 -benjamin