From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5156 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2002 12:26:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5111 invoked by uid 71); 4 Jul 2002 12:26:02 -0000 Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 05:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020704122602.5110.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: -=Quequero=- Subject: Re: optimization/7108: gcc 3.1 initialize two times the same variable Reply-To: -=Quequero=- X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/7108; it has been noted by GNATS. From: -=Quequero=- To: rth@gcc.gnu.org,gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,quequero@linux.bitchx.it,gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/7108: gcc 3.1 initialize two times the same variable Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 14:21:45 +0200 At 00.33 04/07/2002 +0000, you wrote: > Since you clearly didn't turn on optimization, what did you > expect? > >http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7108 yes i know optimization is off in my example...btw, optimization or not, initializing two times the same variable is always unuseful...I have reported this _bug_ only for that :) thanx a lot -=Quequero=- SpP/Member www.spippolatori.com UIC Founder www.quequero.cjb.net Linux Registered User #207978 Slackware User #12573