From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-20175-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25699 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2002 17:06:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25682 invoked by uid 71); 4 Jul 2002 17:06:02 -0000
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 10:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020704170602.25681.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/7186: DR179 for std::deque::iterator and const_iterator
Reply-To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/7186; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: pcarlini@unitus.it
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/7186: DR179 for std::deque::iterator and const_iterator
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 09:49:35 -0700

 > - Metrowerks8 is able to compile both (this is the behaviour mandated
 > by the resolution of DR179, according to my reading)
 
 I believe this is what v3 should shoot for as well.
 
 -benjamin