From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1898 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2002 00:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1884 invoked by uid 71); 11 Jul 2002 00:26:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020711002600.1883.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Chilung Wang" Subject: RE: other/7254: GCC Error target = MN10200 Reply-To: "Chilung Wang" X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR other/7254; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Chilung Wang" To: Cc: , =?big5?B?vbKp+q31?= Subject: RE: other/7254: GCC Error target = MN10200 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:19:30 +0800 Jeff, Yes, we plan to use MN10200 parts as the Compiler based for our propriety CPU. The CPU is 16 bit data registers and has 20 bit address registers. The architecture is very similar to MN10200. We just verify our compiler based on GCC 2.95.1 and pass the Testing Suite. We plan to upgrade to GCC 3.0 and meet the problem. We want to solve the MN10200 void problem in order to smooth the upgrade from 2.95.1 to 3.0. Could you tell us how to solve the problem we can do it by ourselves. Chilung -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Law [mailto:law@porcupine.slc.redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 2:08 AM To: chilung@itri.org.tw Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/7254: GCC Error target = MN10200 In message <20020710061853.13108.qmail@sources.redhat.com>, chilung@itri.org.tw writes: > >>Number: 7254 >>Category: other >>Synopsis: GCC Error target = MN10200 >>Confidential: no >>Severity: serious >>Priority: medium >>Responsible: unassigned >>State: open >>Class: sw-bug >>Submitter-Id: net >>Arrival-Date: Tue Jul 09 23:26:00 PDT 2002 >>Closed-Date: >>Last-Modified: >>Originator: chilung@itri.org.tw >>Release: GCC 3.1 >>Organization: >>Environment: >Linux >>Description: >The GCC 3.1 Target = MN10200. Compiler the following > >==================== >void f() >{ >} >==================== > >A Compiler exception occcurs. Note that the mn102 port is currently scheduled to be removed in the next major release of GCC as it's currently unmaintained and believed to be unused. Are you planning to use the mn102 port for anything? If so, what? jeff