From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8501 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2002 23:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8487 invoked by uid 71); 11 Jul 2002 23:46:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020711234601.8486.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Alan Modra Subject: Re: optimization/7130: miscompiled code for gcc-3.1 in powerpc linux with -funroll-all-loops Reply-To: Alan Modra X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00369.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/7130; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alan Modra To: Andreas Jaeger Cc: yozo@cs.berkeley.edu, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/7130: miscompiled code for gcc-3.1 in powerpc linux with -funroll-all-loops Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:12:20 +0930 On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:06:55PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Alan Modra writes: > > > (And this time, I waited for bootstrap to get through building the stage2 > > compiler before firing off emails.) > > > What about the testsuite? Any new regressions or passes? New regressions unfortunately. Patch withdrawn until I can figure out what is going wrong. > I guess this is on Powerpc-linux? Yes. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre