From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-20383-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15420 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2002 18:06:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15405 invoked by uid 71); 12 Jul 2002 18:06:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020712180601.15404.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@wasabisystems.com>
Subject: Re: target/6912: x86_64 switch code generation problem with -fPIC
Reply-To: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@wasabisystems.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00385.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/6912; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@wasabisystems.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/6912: x86_64 switch code generation problem with -fPIC
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:57:41 +0200

 As of 20020711, both the trunk and the 3.1 branch seem to generate correct
 code again.
 
 The 3.1 branch uses a correct movslq, and -current, while not doing the
 sign extension, always seems to put the jumptable in the text segment,
 right after the table index + jump code. So the offsets are always
 positive.