From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-20406-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18722 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2002 03:06:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18708 invoked by uid 71); 13 Jul 2002 03:06:00 -0000
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020713030600.18707.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: c/6326: gcc compile illegal code
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/6326; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, act.kronoz@activenetwork.it,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/6326: gcc compile illegal code
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:02:27 -0400

 Even reading the standard from your bug report:
 `The empty list in a function=A0 declarator that is not part of
 a definition=A0 of that function=A0 specifies that no information=A0=20
 about the
 number or types of the parameters is supplied.'
 It looks like:
 int foo() {
 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 return 0;
 }
 
 should and is currently equal to, like K&R C,
 int foo(...) {
 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 return 0;
 }
 
 Therefore this bug report should be closed.
 
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=3Dview%20audit-
 trail&database=3Dgcc&pr=3D6326