From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30565 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2002 10:06:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30532 invoked by uid 71); 14 Jul 2002 10:06:03 -0000 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 03:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020714100603.30531.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Adrian Knoth Subject: Re: ada/7208: build of gnatlib failed with SIGILL Reply-To: Adrian Knoth X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00438.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR ada/7208; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Adrian Knoth To: Florian Weimer Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: ada/7208: build of gnatlib failed with SIGILL Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:56:20 +0200 On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:46:57AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Yes. I've tried it with the actual cvs co, here is the result, though > > SIGILL changed to segfault: > We need a GDB backtrace of the gnat1 process when it receives SIGILL, > and a disassembly of the function corresponding to the topmost frame. Is it ok for you if I'll send you a statically linked version of my xgcc and the corefile? (to your personal address? I guess the gcc-list doesn't want it) I've now deleted everything, cvs co will follow and the static built, too. I guess building without threads is easier for you to debug, isn't it? -- mail: adi@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP: v2-key via keyserver Ist die Katze schoen rund, freut sich der Hund!