From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-20461-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12604 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2002 13:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12590 invoked by uid 71); 15 Jul 2002 13:26:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 06:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020715132601.12589.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/7311: inline functions do not give control reaches end of non-void function in g++
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00463.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/7311; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: Bas Wijnen <shevek@fmf.nl>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: c++/7311: inline functions do not give control reaches end of non-void function in g++
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:19:50 -0400

 This has been fixed in gcc version 3.3 20020713 (experimental) at least.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski
 
 On Monday, July 15, 2002, at 08:30 , Bas Wijnen wrote:
 
 > class foo
 > {
 > public:
 >   int bar ()
 >   {
 >   }
 > };
 >
 > int main ()
 > {
 >   foo f;
 >   f.bar ();
 >   return 0;
 > }