From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-20469-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17765 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2002 21:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17718 invoked by uid 71); 15 Jul 2002 21:26:00 -0000
Resent-Date: 15 Jul 2002 21:26:00 -0000
Resent-Message-ID: <20020715212600.17717.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nathan@codesourcery.com
Received: (qmail 14586 invoked by uid 61); 15 Jul 2002 21:18:25 -0000
Message-Id: <20020715211825.14585.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 14:26:00 -0000
From: nathan@codesourcery.com
Reply-To: nathan@codesourcery.com
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31)
Subject: c++/7319: misleading template in error message
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>


>Number:         7319
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       misleading template in error message
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Jul 15 14:26:00 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     nathan@codesourcery.com
>Release:        unknown-1.0
>Organization:
>Environment:

>Description:
The attached program fails to compile with,
nathan@uha:21>g++ -c foo.cc
foo.cc: In function `void Foo(const A&)':
foo.cc:11: call of overloaded `Foo(int)' is ambiguous
foo.cc:7: candidates are: void A::Foo(T) const [with T = int] <near match>
foo.cc:4:                 void A::Foo(T, int = 0) [with T = int] <near match>

note that function on line 7 is shown with a const qualified
this pointer - the specialization has no const qualifier (and
that is the cause of the problem). I'm sure there are other
cases of specializations changing non-templated parms.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="foo.cc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="foo.cc"

c3RydWN0IEEKewogIHRlbXBsYXRlIDx0eXBlbmFtZSBUPiB2b2lkIEZvbyAoVCkgY29uc3Q7CiAg
dGVtcGxhdGUgPHR5cGVuYW1lIFQ+IHZvaWQgRm9vIChULCBpbnQgPSAwKTsKfTsKCnRlbXBsYXRl
IDw+IHZvaWQgQTo6Rm9vIChpbnQpOwoKdm9pZCBGb28gKEEgY29uc3QgJnB0cikKewogIHB0ci5G
b28gKDApOwp9Cgo=