From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-20486-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19361 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2002 13:56:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19336 invoked by uid 71); 16 Jul 2002 13:56:00 -0000
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 06:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020716135600.19332.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mattias Engdeg=E5rd?=" <mattias@virtutech.se>
Subject: Re: target/6981: wrong code in 64-bit manipulation on x86
Reply-To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mattias Engdeg=E5rd?=" <mattias@virtutech.se>
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/6981; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mattias Engdeg=E5rd?=" <mattias@virtutech.se>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/6981: wrong code in 64-bit manipulation on x86
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:54:24 +0200

 I should make it clear that this is a regression from gcc 3.0.x, so someone
 may want to elevate the priority.