From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10155 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2002 17:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10135 invoked by uid 71); 17 Jul 2002 17:56:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 10:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020717175601.10134.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Graham Stott Subject: Re: optimization/7339: ICE on simple code with GCC 3.1 Reply-To: Graham Stott X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00531.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/7339; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Graham Stott To: lloyd@acm.jhu.edu Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/7339: ICE on simple code with GCC 3.1 Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:51:31 +0100 > I'm compiling with g++ but I don't think there is anything C++-centric about the ICE. All that's needed to trigger the abort is to (>> 32) a 32 bit var as in the following C sample. -------------------------------------------------------- typedef unsigned long valueT; valueT md_apply_fix3 (valueT *valP) { valueT value = * valP; return (((value) >> 32) & 0xffff); } ----------------------------------------------------------