From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4360 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2002 15:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4347 invoked by uid 71); 19 Jul 2002 15:26:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 08:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020719152601.4346.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: dje@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Nikhil R. Deshpande" Subject: Re: libstdc++/6991: Seg fault in std::num_put (called from ostringstream::operator<<) while putting numbers Reply-To: "Nikhil R. Deshpande" X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00566.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6991; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Nikhil R. Deshpande" To: , , , Cc: Subject: Re: libstdc++/6991: Seg fault in std::num_put (called from ostringstream::operator<<) while putting numbers Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:16:57 -0400 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C22F15.CB8624E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=3Dview%20audit-trail&database=3D= gcc&pr=3D6991 dje wrote: > I cannot reproduce this. > =20 > on x86/linux, I've been unable to reproduce this with the = following: > =20 > gcc-3_1-branch > gcc The problem is reproducible on my machine with=20 AIX 4.3.3.0 GCC 3.0.4 (and not x86/linux). Is there any way I can help you in solving this? (I have a very similar = problem on GCC 3.0.4 on Solaris 2.8, but I am unable to produce a simple test case.) With regards, Nikhil ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C22F15.CB8624E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?c= md=3Dview%20audit-trail&database=3Dgcc&pr=3D6991
 
dje wrote:
> I cannot reproduce this.
>   
>    on = x86/linux,=20 I've been unable to reproduce this with the following:
>   
>   =20 gcc-3_1-branch
>    gcc
The problem is reproducible on my = machine with=20
AIX 4.3.3.0
GCC = 3.0.4
(and not x86/linux).
Is there any way I can help you in = solving this? (I=20 have a very similar problem on GCC 3.0.4
on Solaris 2.8, but I am unable to = produce a=20 simple test case.)
 
With regards,
 Nikhil
 
------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C22F15.CB8624E0--