From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 507 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2002 19:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 492 invoked by uid 71); 25 Jul 2002 19:06:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020725190601.491.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: dank@kegel.com Subject: Re: libstdc++/7383: atomic operations not atomic on ppc405 Reply-To: dank@kegel.com X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00693.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/7383; it has been noted by GNATS. From: dank@kegel.com To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, dank@kegel.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: libstdc++/7383: atomic operations not atomic on ppc405 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:02:18 -0700 I have updated my patch to also fix the stwcx in boehm-gc used by gcj; see http://www.kegel.com/xgcc3/gcc-20020722-ppc405erratum77.patch This new patch is untested, but extremely similar to the earlier patch which did seem to fix the libstdc++ problem, and simple enough that one might be able to trust it by inspection. Note that libc/4155 is related; you have to fix both. http://bugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=4155 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7383