From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14722 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2002 08:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14703 invoked by uid 71); 29 Jul 2002 08:26:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 01:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020729082601.14702.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Topi Maenpaa Subject: Re: c++/7428: Precedence in selecting overloaded operators Reply-To: Topi Maenpaa X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00755.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/7428; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Topi Maenpaa To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, Cc: Subject: Re: c++/7428: Precedence in selecting overloaded operators Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 11:22:52 +0300 (EEST) You are welcome :) Please don't waste your time with this. I was finally able to solve the confusion myself, and it turned out I had just stupidly mistaken couple of things. Good luck. On 29 Jul 2002 gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org wrote: >Thank you very much for your problem report. >It has the internal identification `c++/7428'. >The individual assigned to look at your >report is: unassigned. > >>Category: c++ >>Responsible: unassigned >>Synopsis: Precedence in selecting overloaded operators >>Arrival-Date: Mon Jul 29 00:26:00 PDT 2002 > -Topi- << http://ee.oulu.fi/~topiolli >>