From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-20799-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4972 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2002 03:36:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4957 invoked by uid 71); 31 Jul 2002 03:36:00 -0000
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020731033600.4956.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "David E. Weekly" <david@there.com>
Subject: RE: preprocessor/7452: Preprocessor doesn't allow pasting " foo-> ## BAR "
Reply-To: "David E. Weekly" <david@there.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00801.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/7452; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "David E. Weekly" <david@there.com>
To: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: preprocessor/7452: Preprocessor doesn't allow pasting " foo-> ## BAR "
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:30:01 -0700

 Andrew,
 
 Does the standard allow some way to tack on a method name (i.e., "is there
 another way to do this?"), or has this useful feature simply been
 permanently removed?
 
 Also: why is this construct illegal?
 
 Yours,
  David E. Weekly
  Software Developer
  There, Inc.
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pinskia@physics.uc.edu]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:23 PM
 To: david@there.com
 Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
 Subject: Re: preprocessor/7452: Preprocessor doesn't allow pasting "
 foo-> ## BAR "
 Importance: High
 
 
 What you are doing is illegal according the C standard.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski