From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7515 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2002 03:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7497 invoked by uid 71); 31 Jul 2002 03:46:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020731034602.7495.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: preprocessor/7452: Preprocessor doesn't allow pasting " foo-> ## BAR " Reply-To: Andrew Pinski X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00802.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/7452; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrew Pinski To: "David E. Weekly" Cc: Subject: Re: preprocessor/7452: Preprocessor doesn't allow pasting " foo-> ## BAR " Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:41:52 -0400 It is illegal because you are trying to paste together two tokens which do not make one token in terms of the C standard. It has been permanently removed because gcc uses a new preprocessor, this has been this way since 3.0. You might get what you expect from using the option -traditional-cpp. Thanks, Andrew Pinski On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 11:30 , David E. Weekly wrote: > Andrew, > > Does the standard allow some way to tack on a method name > (i.e., "is there > another way to do this?"), or has this useful feature simply been > permanently removed? > > Also: why is this construct illegal? > > Yours, > David E. Weekly > Software Developer > There, Inc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pinskia@physics.uc.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:23 PM > To: david@there.com > Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: preprocessor/7452: Preprocessor doesn't allow pasting " > foo-> ## BAR " > Importance: High > > > What you are doing is illegal according the C standard. > > Thanks, > Andrew Pinski > > >