From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1931 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2002 09:06:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1915 invoked by uid 71); 2 Aug 2002 09:06:03 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 02:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020802090603.1907.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Gabriel Dos Reis Subject: Re: c++/7468: prototype "doesn't match" a candidate that is actually a perfect match. Reply-To: Gabriel Dos Reis X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/7468; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: carlo@alinoe.com Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/7468: prototype "doesn't match" a candidate that is actually a perfect match. Date: 02 Aug 2002 10:55:41 +0200 carlo@alinoe.com writes: [...] | Note that the error goes away | when either | 1) the template is removed | 2) the static const is removed and '4' is put directly in the typedef | 3) the typedef is replaced by a more normal typedef | 4) the (foo_t*) is replaced with (foo_t) | | Very peculiar bug. Indeed. This bug is actually a duplicate of old PRs (I don't have the id off hand but I do know it is there since :-). I'll close yours and mention the previous entry. OK? -- Gaby