From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15510 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2002 09:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15489 invoked by uid 71); 2 Aug 2002 09:36:02 -0000 Resent-Date: 2 Aug 2002 09:36:02 -0000 Resent-Message-ID: <20020802093602.15488.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, grigory@stl.sarov.ru Received: (qmail 12016 invoked by uid 61); 2 Aug 2002 09:27:53 -0000 Message-Id: <20020802092753.12015.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 02:36:00 -0000 From: grigory@stl.sarov.ru Reply-To: grigory@stl.sarov.ru To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31) Subject: c++/7470: Vtable: virtual function pointers not in declaration order X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 List-Id: >Number: 7470 >Category: c++ >Synopsis: Vtable: virtual function pointers not in declaration order >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Fri Aug 02 02:36:01 PDT 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Grigory Zagorodnev >Release: 3.1.1 >Organization: >Environment: Red Hat Linux release 7.1 (Seawolf) Kernel 2.4.2-2smp on a 2-processor i686 gcc version 3.1.1 Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --program-suffix=-3.1.1 --enable-threads Thread model: posix >Description: The C++ ABI defines order of virtual function pointers in such way: "2.5.2 Virtual Table Components and Order The order of the virtual function pointers in a virtual table is the order of declaration of the corresponding member functions in the class. There is an entry for any virtual function declared in a class, whether it is a new function or overrides a base class function, unless it overrides a function from the primary base, and conversion between their return types does not require an adjustment." *** G++ 3.1.1 compiler violates given rules *** Let's consider the example. --- fail.cpp ---------------------- struct base { short b; virtual int foo() {} }; struct derived: virtual base { int d; virtual int foo() {} virtual int bar() {} }; ----------------------------------- Note that function declaration order is "foo, bar" and 'base' is not the primary base class for 'derived', since it's not nearly empty class. New we check the virtual table for 'derived' class using "g++-3.1.1 -c -fdump-class-hierarchy fail.cpp". The virtual table is: Vtable for derived derived::_ZTV7derived: 9 entries 0 8 4 0 8 &_ZTI7derived 12 derived::bar() 16 derived::foo() 20 0fffffff8 24 0fffffff8 28 &_ZTI7derived 32 derived::_ZTv0_n12_N7derived3fooEv() We see that virtual functions appear in the order "bar, foo" which is wrong. It's expected to have functions in the declaration order as spcified by the ABI. >How-To-Repeat: 1. Compile given testcase g++-3.1.1 -c -fdump-class-hierarchy fail.cpp 2. Look for 'derived' virtual table in the produced fail.cpp.class file >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: