From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7533 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2002 12:26:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7516 invoked by uid 71); 2 Aug 2002 12:26:08 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 05:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020802122608.7515.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Carlo Wood Subject: Re: c++/7468: prototype "doesn't match" a candidate that is actually a perfect match. Reply-To: Carlo Wood X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/7468; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Carlo Wood To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/7468: prototype "doesn't match" a candidate that is actually a perfect match. Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 14:20:58 +0200 On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > carlo@alinoe.com writes: > > [...] > > | Note that the error goes away > | when either > | 1) the template is removed > | 2) the static const is removed and '4' is put directly in the typedef > | 3) the typedef is replaced by a more normal typedef > | 4) the (foo_t*) is replaced with (foo_t) > | > | Very peculiar bug. > > Indeed. This bug is actually a duplicate of old PRs (I don't have the > id off hand but I do know it is there since :-). I'll close yours and > mention the previous entry. OK? > > -- Gaby Hmm, not really ok unless you are sure it will be fixed. This problem looks a bit like PR 54, but that has been suspended for "years" :/. Besides, it says "it was fixed" (a year ago), so are you SURE this isn't a new bug? -- Carlo Wood