From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27051 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2002 13:46:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27029 invoked by uid 71); 2 Aug 2002 13:46:03 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 06:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020802134603.27026.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Gabriel Dos Reis Subject: Re: c++/7468: prototype "doesn't match" a candidate that is actually a perfect match. Reply-To: Gabriel Dos Reis X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/7468; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: Carlo Wood Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/7468: prototype "doesn't match" a candidate that is actually a perfect match. Date: 02 Aug 2002 15:36:49 +0200 Carlo Wood writes: | On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > carlo@alinoe.com writes: | > | > [...] | > | > | Note that the error goes away | > | when either | > | 1) the template is removed | > | 2) the static const is removed and '4' is put directly in the typedef | > | 3) the typedef is replaced by a more normal typedef | > | 4) the (foo_t*) is replaced with (foo_t) | > | | > | Very peculiar bug. | > | > Indeed. This bug is actually a duplicate of old PRs (I don't have the | > id off hand but I do know it is there since :-). I'll close yours and | > mention the previous entry. OK? | > | > -- Gaby | | Hmm, not really ok unless you are sure it will be fixed. Since the problems are the same, if one is fixed then the other will be fixed :-) | This problem looks a bit like PR 54, but that has been suspended | for "years" :/. Besides, it says "it was fixed" (a year ago), | so are you SURE this isn't a new bug? it says it is fixed on the old *cp-branch*, not in the 3.2 branch. -- Gaby