From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21758 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2002 04:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21739 invoked by uid 71); 7 Aug 2002 04:16:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 21:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020807041601.21738.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: geoffk@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Geoff Keating Subject: Re: optimization/7515: invalid inlining Reply-To: Geoff Keating X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/7515; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Geoff Keating To: drepper@redhat.com Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/7515: invalid inlining Date: 06 Aug 2002 21:11:41 -0700 This is not a bug unless -fpic is used, since executables themselves will not have any symbols overriden, correct? -- - Geoffrey Keating