From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-20987-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8163 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2002 10:16:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8147 invoked by uid 71); 8 Aug 2002 10:16:03 -0000
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 03:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020808101603.8146.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Stian <stian@knowledge-network.no>
Subject: Re: c/7527: gcc 2.95.3 and gcc 3.0.4 generate incorrect code
Reply-To: Stian <stian@knowledge-network.no>
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/7527; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Stian <stian@knowledge-network.no>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, 
	tomdean@asus.tddhome
Subject: Re: c/7527: gcc 2.95.3 and gcc 3.0.4 generate incorrect code
Date: 08 Aug 2002 12:08:55 +0200

 The second conditional makes more sense if you use () at the right places
 
 if(!(_io_ports[0x39]&0x80))
 
 
 If you don't add them, your statement is the same as
 
 if((!_io_ports[0x39])&0x80)
 
 That always come out false, then ! makes the result of the io-read either 0 or 1.
 
 
 
 Stian