From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-21035-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9391 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2002 03:36:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9377 invoked by uid 71); 10 Aug 2002 03:36:00 -0000
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 02:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020810033600.9376.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Michael Veksler <veksler@il.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/7175: Calculation yields different results for version
 optimized with -O2
Reply-To: Michael Veksler <veksler@il.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/7175; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Michael Veksler <veksler@il.ibm.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, weber@informatik.uni-kl.de
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/7175: Calculation yields different results for version
 optimized with -O2
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 06:29:05 +0300

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7175
 
 The moment you will add at the beginning of your main():
   fpu_control_t fpu_bits;
   _FPU_GETCW(fpu_bits);
   fpu_bits &= ~_FPU_EXTENDED;
   fpu_bits |= _FPU_DOUBLE;
   _FPU_SETCW(fpu_bits);
 
 Assuming you init "res" to zeros, you are goint to get a consistent
 result.
 This probably means that this PR is basically the same as PR/6914.